He must be American

A true competitive selection process may have turn up the best possible candidate as head of UNICEF and not power politics.

Barack Obama, US President, and Nicholas Sarkozy, French President, in 2009 (Image by Pete Souza for US White House, CC Licensed).

The Obama administration announced last week its nomination of Anthony Lake to serve as the new head of UNICEF (the United Nations Children’s Fund). Current Executive Director Ann Veneman, a Bush appointee, announced she would not seek a second term in an e-mail to all UNICEF staff in late December 2009. Publicly, Veneman declined to give a reason for her departure.

The bulk of 70-year-old Anthony Lake’s experience is as a national security advisor for the Clinton Administration. While Lake has laudably served on the boards of several child right’s organizations, including Save the Children and the US Fund for UNICEF, his expertise is in advancing the interests of the U.S. government.

For years, insiders at UNICEF and in the international community have fumed at the progression of Americans running the agency.  They have every right to be upset.  The U.S. traditionally gets to pick the head of UNICEF simply because they are the largest donor to the agency. While all countries are currently allowed to “nominate” candidates, it’s a dog and pony show that always comes out in favor of the American nomination.

Wouldn’t a true competitive selection process turn up the best possible candidate? Other UN agencies have created more transparent processes for selecting their Executive Directors, such as UNAIDS. Ban Ki-Moon and the UNICEF Board should take this opportunity to end the unspoken rule that the U.S. controls UNICEF’s direction. After all, the children and young people UNICEF serve deserve the best possible Executive Director around – not one whose greatest qualification is he’s American.

Further Reading

After Paul Biya

Cameroon’s president has ruled for over four decades by silence and survival. Now, with dynastic succession looming and no clear exit strategy, the country teeters between inertia and implosion.

Leapfrogging literacy?

In outsourcing the act of writing to machines trained on Western language and thought, we risk reinforcing the very hierarchies that decolonization sought to undo.

Repoliticizing a generation

Thirty-eight years after Thomas Sankara’s assassination, the struggle for justice and self-determination endures—from stalled archives and unfulfilled verdicts to new calls for pan-African renewal and a 21st-century anti-imperialist front.

Drip is temporary

The apparel brand Drip was meant to prove that South Africa’s townships could inspire global style. Instead, it revealed how easily black success stories are consumed and undone by the contradictions of neoliberal aspiration.

Energy for whom?

Behind the fanfare of the Africa Climate Summit, the East African Crude Oil Pipeline shows how neocolonial extraction still drives Africa’s energy future.